De la vigilancia al juicio crítico en la evaluación universitaria frente a la IA generativa

Autores/as

  • Eduardo Tovar Martínez Universidad Politécnica de San Luis Potosí
  • José Daniel Sánchez Vásquez Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí

Palabras clave:

Inteligencia artificial, Evaluación, Educación

Resumen

En este ensayo de análisis conceptual, basado en la revisión crítica de literatura reciente y de marcos emergentes de diseño de evaluación, examinamos los desafíos y oportunidades que la inteligencia artificial generativa (GenAI) plantea para la evaluación universitaria. El objetivo es responder a la pregunta de si la evaluación debe reforzar modelos centrados en la vigilancia y la detección, o bien transitar hacia enfoques orientados al juicio crítico, la transparencia y la responsabilidad en la interacción humano–máquina. Se sostiene que las estrategias centradas en vigilancia y detección son insuficientes y contraproducentes, pues debilitan la confianza, la autonomía y la justicia cognitiva. Con base en la evidencia disponible, se propone desplazar el foco de los productos finales hacia los procesos de aprendizaje, valorando la trazabilidad, la procedencia y el juicio crítico. Asimismo, se analizan las brechas tecnológicas, las tensiones entre integridad académica, justicia cognitiva y preparación profesional, así como los riesgos asociados a la dependencia de plataformas corporativas. Finalmente, se argumenta que la universidad pública latinoamericana puede convertir la GenAI en un recurso pedagógico equitativo y humanista, reafirmando su misión de democratizar el conocimiento y formar ciudadanía crítica.

Biografía del autor/a

Eduardo Tovar Martínez, Universidad Politécnica de San Luis Potosí

Profesor de Asignatura. Divisiones de Manufactura Avanzada y Ciencias, Universidad Politécnica de San Luis Potosí, México.

José Daniel Sánchez Vásquez, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí

Profesor-Investigador. Departamento de Físico-Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (UASLP), México.

Citas

Aquino, S. P., García, V., y Palmeros, G. (2020). Atención a grupos vulnerables e indicadores de equidad en educación superior: Caso de una universidad pública en el sureste mexicano. Dilemas contemporáneos: Educación, Polí- tica y Valores. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v32i1.1995

Blake Angulo, J. (2026). Docencia e inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior en América Latina: Focos y vacíos de la investigación emergente (revisión sistemática 2023-2025). Revista Realidad Educativa, 6(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.38123/rre.v6i1.600

Bouamor, H., Gongora-Svartzman, G., Heimann, L., & Huang, S. (2025). Evalua- ting GenAI’s Effectiveness for Students with Varied Programming Back- grounds in a Software Development Course. Proceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2, 1395–1396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641555.3705175

Doorsamy, W., Padayachee, K., & Cornell, A. S. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelli- gence and Encounters with Knowledge in stem Higher Education Curricula. 2025 ieee Global Engineering Education Conference (educon), 1–5. https:// doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON62633.2025.11016322

Elshall, A. S., & Badir, A. (2025). Balancing ai-assisted learning and tradi- tional assessment: The FACT assessment in environmental data science education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1596462. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1596462

Feng, T. H., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wünsche, B. C., & Denny, P. (2025). From Auto- mation to Cognition: Redefining the Roles of Educators and Generative ai in Computing Education. Proceedings of the 27th Australasian Computing Education Conference, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3716640.3716658

Furze, L., Perkins, M., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The ai Assessment Scale (aias) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 40(4). https://doi. org/10.14742/ajet.9434

Gao, Y., Zhai, X., Li, M., Lee, G., & Liu, X. (2025). A Multimodal Interactive Framework for Science Assessment in the Era of Generative Artificial Inte- lligence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, tea.70009. https://doi. org/10.1002/tea.70009

Huallpa, J. J., Flores Arocutipa, J. P., Panduro, W. D., Huete, L. C., Flores Limo, F. A., Herrera, E. E., Alba Callacna, R. A., Ariza Flores, V. A., Medina Romero,

M. Á., Quispe, I. M., y Hernández Hernández, F. A. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Perio- dicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 105-115. https://doi. org/10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770

Huang, D., Huang, Y., & Cummings, J. J. (2024). Exploring the integration and utili- sation of generative ai in formative e-assessments: A case study in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4) https:// doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9467

Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Ruseva, M., & Kabaivanov, S. (2025). A Framework for Generative ia-Driven Assessment in Higher Education. Information, 16(6), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060472

Jongkind, R., Elings, E., Joukes, E., Broens, T., Leopold, H., Wiesman, F., & Meinema, J. (2025). Is your curriculum GenAI-proof? A method for GenAI impact assessment and a case study. MedEdPublish, 15, 11. https://doi. org/10.12688/mep.20815.1

Khlaif, Z. N., Alkouk, W. A., Salama, N., & Abu Eideh, B. (2025). Redesigning Assessments for ia-Enhanced Learning: A Framework for Educators in the Generative ia Era. Education Sciences, 15(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020174

Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 12 de diciembre de 1996 (México). https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/es/legislation/details/16108

Lloyd, C., Doherty, S., Herb, A., & Warburton, S. (2024). A risk-based approach to mitigating the Gen(AI) challenge to assessment integrity: The Programmatic Assessment Security Project (pasp). Proceedings ascilite, 53–54. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2024.1387

López, F. E., Angulo, M. R., y Sosa, D. I. (2025). Formación Docente en ia Gene- rativa: Impacto Ético y Retos en Educación Superior. Alteridad, 20(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v20n2.2025.01

Lugo, L. J., y Barrera, M. Á. (2024). Actualización sobre el concepto de brecha digital en tiempos de la inteligencia artificial: Hacia una propuesta cualitativa. Sintaxis, 13, 49–78. https://doi.org/10.36105/stx.2024n13.05

Luo (Jess), J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assess- ment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 2602938.2024.2309963

Lye, C. Y., & Lim, L. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Tertiary Education: Assessment Redesign Principles and Considerations. Education Sciences, 14(6), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060569

Mateus, J.-C., Cappello, G., Lugo, N., & Guerrero, M. (2024). Communication Educators Facing the Arrival of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Exploration in Mexico, Peru, and Spain. Digital Education Review, 45, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.106-114

Matindingue, A. D., Conte, E., & Duduka, J.. (2025). Navegando nas Fron- teiras Éticas: Uma Revisão do Impacto da Inteligência Artificial na EAD. Avaliação: Revista Da Avaliação Da Educação Superior (campinas), 30, e025026. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-57652025v30id293990

Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative ai tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151

Morjaria, L., Burns, L., Bracken, K., Ngo, Q. N., Lee, M., Levinson, A. J., Smith, J., Thompson, P., & Sibbald, M. (2023). Examining the Threat of ChatGPT to the Validity of Short Answer Assessments in an Undergraduate Medical Program. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231204178

Murcia, D., Jaime, M. F., Jaramillo, L. F., & Hoyos, Y. A. (2025). GenAI in Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment: Stakeholders Insights from Two Undergraduate Language Programs. Lenguaje, 53(1S), e20314387. https:// doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v53i1S.14387

Nikolic, S., Daniel, S., Haque, R., Belkina, M., Hassan, G. M., Grundy, S., Lyden, S., Neal, P., & Sandison, C. (2023). ChatGPT versus engineering education assessment: A multidisciplinary and multi-institutional benchmarking and analysis of this generative artificial intelligence tool to investigate assessment integrity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(4), 559–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2213169

Niño, D. O. (2025). Pedagogia: Oportunidades y desafíos para enseñar en la era de la inteligencia artificial. Voces y Silencios. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación, 16(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.18175/VyS16.2.2025.8

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (aias): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative ai in Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

Petrovska, O., Clift, L., Moller, F., & Pearsall, R. (2024). Incorporating Generative ai into Software Development Education. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Computing Education Practice, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3633053.3633057

Salinas, D. E., Vilalta, E., Michel, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024). Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Lear- ning for Authentic Assessment. Education Sciences, 14(1), 83. https://doi. org/10.3390/educsci14010083

Sharma, A., Shailendra, S., & Kadel, R. (2025). Experiences with Content Develo- pment and Assessment Design in the Era of GenAI. 2025 6th International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering, and Education (csee), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE64583.2025.00008

Shishavan, H.B. (2024). aiin higher education: Guidelines on assessment design from Australian universities. ascilite Publications, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2024.1205

Valdivieso, T., & González, O. (2025). Generative ai Tools in Salvadoran Higher Education: Balancing Equity, Ethics, and Knowledge Management in the Global South. Education Sciences, 15(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci15020214

Verdicchio, M. (2025). Adapting Program Assessment for the Age of Generative ai. 2025 IEEE Engineering Education World Conference (edunine), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE62377.2025.10981409

Weng, X., Xia, Q., Gu, M., Rajaram, K., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Assessment and learning outcomes for generative AI in higher education: A scoping review on current research status and trends. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9540

White, A., & Huber, E. (2024). Evaluating an online assessment framework through the lens of Generative ai. ascilite Publications, 618–623. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2024.1423

Wilson, S. E., & Nishimoto, M. (2024). Assessing Learning of Computer Progra-

ming Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 146(5), 051003. https://doi.org/10.1115/ 1.4064364

Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z

Yeadon, W., Inyang, O.-O., Mizouri, A., Peach, A., & Testrow, C. P. (2023). The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming ai revolution. Physics Education, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acc5cf

Zhao, J., Chapman, E., & Sabet, P. G. P. (2024). Generative ai and Educational Assessments: A Systematic Review. Education Research and Perspectives, 51, 124–155. https://doi.org/10.70953/ERPv51.2412006

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-17

Cómo citar

Tovar Martínez, E., & Sánchez Vásquez, J. D. (2026). De la vigilancia al juicio crítico en la evaluación universitaria frente a la IA generativa. Reencuentro. Análisis De Problemas Universitarios, 37(89), 123–146. Recuperado a partir de https://reencuentro.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/reencuentro/article/view/1352

Artículos similares

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.